My article for Building magazine on the many flaws in the government’s healthcare reforms turned out to be very timely – by the time it appeared, they’d had a major rethink. Indeed, there was so much to say on the unanswered questions in the Health and Social Care Bill that the article ended up expanding over five pages, and that was only looking at a relatively non-emotive aspect of the plans: what exactly is going to happen to the £36bn-worth of property owned by the Primary Care Trusts once they’re gone?
If you think green building is a niche topic, head down to Ecobuild. It’s not only one of the largest events in the UK, but the largest in the world focusing on sustainable construction and architecture. More than 50,000 people came to ExCeL in east London for Ecobuild 2011 – and when I was there, most of them were trying to fit into the conference hall where Brian Cox was speaking. But there were a great many other contributors over the three day programme, with a very diverse range of views and interests. I edited a blog on the Ecobuild site in the months leading up to the event, which meant I got to talk to them about all sorts of things including why climate talks fail, the truth about eco-cities in the desert and why Christmas houses might not be a total sustainability nightmare…
“Would I be surprised if this person were to die at some stage in the near future?” That’s probably not a question many of those working with homeless people will feel comfortable asking themselves. But according to a new NHS guide to end-of-life care in hostels, it’s something they should bear in mind if they’re going to fulfil their clients’ last wishes and offer them a dignified death. It may be the only certainty, but death remains a difficult subject for both hostel residents and workers. In this article for Inside Housing, I spoke to the guide’s authors about starting difficult conversations, coping with serial bereavement and resisting the urge to force a “Cilla” moment.
Imagine you’d been sleeping on the streets for more than 40 years, and someone gave you £3000 to spend on anything you liked – what would you buy? That’s exactly what happened in a groundbreaking pilot project in London, when homeless charity Broadway gave 15 long-term rough sleepers personalised budgets and support to spend them however they chose. The results have far surpassed their cautious expectations. Eighteen months on, nine of the men are now in accommodation, some after decades on the streets, and both they and the professionals involved in the project believe the same approach could work to tackle homelessness elsewhere, as I found out in this piece for Inside Housing. The men’s requests were humbling – a new pair of glasses, a hearing aid, an Oyster card – and the average spend was just £794 over the first year. Broadway’s project will continue, but the Department for Communities and Local Government was reticent as to whether it would become official government policy – even though it not only appears to work, doesn’t cost very much and aligns perfectly with the ideals of choice and personalisation in public services.
With nearly 1.8 million people on the UK’s housing registers, tenants who sub-let or unlawfully occupy social properties are definitely on landlords’ radars. But tenancy fraud is no bright target bleeping clearly across the screens – it’s a murky, ill-defined blob that is difficult to detect, can surface anywhere and may disappear on closer inspection. The only certainties are that there’s a lot more of it than social landlords may realise, and that their legal bills will be massive. For Inside Housing’s legal supplement, I investigated their options.
The Audit Commission suspects 50,000 social homes, worth more than £2bn, are occupied by people who aren’t entitled to them. But even though tenancy fraud appears to be rife on Britain’s council estates, it’s devilishly hard to detect and even harder to prove. For this Inside Housing article, I got to grips with the very complex legal tools at housing officers’ disposal, and discovered that detective work is definitely not the preserve of the police. Family photos, children’s toys, even toothbrushes can all be dead giveaways – but only if you know what you’re looking for.
Why have a brainstorming session when you can hold a Dragons’ Den? That’s the thought process that seems to be taking place in organisations across the public and private sectors, and social housing is no exception. And as I discovered in this article for Inside Housing, no Den would be complete without sneery judges and emotionally scarred contestants…
Insurance Times’ Lobby series concluded with my look at what new legislation the European Commission was planning to throw at insurers. The answer, I found, is an awful lot, on everything from financial regulation to anti-discrimination. UK politicians may talk a good game but they have little to do the rules that really govern the way businesses work – and how much we pay in premiums. And our leaders will have even less influence if they’re hanging out with far-right fringe groups, rather than people like Merkel and Sarkozy.
Finally! The Tories have outlined some policies. They weren’t quite so forthcoming last week when I was trying to find out exactly what they were going to do about some rather arcane areas of interest to insurers, for Insurance Times’ lobby series. But I did get to speak to some of the less familiar faces on their front bench, including their go-to man for motor insurance, Robert Goodwill. Eurosceptic steam-train enthusiast Goodwill has a model engine with livery that says “Keep The Pound” – could anything BE more Tory?
So the Tories have revived the time-honoured tradition of promising a “bonfire of the quangos” if they get into power. I wrote this article for Building magazine on how likely some of construction’s many semi-public bodies were to survive the flames.